Hello readers.
This is a link to a New York Times article about gay marriage. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/us/25marriage.html This article shows how the attorney general of Maryland wants to change the definition of marriage in their state which posits that marriage is between a man and a woman. Although this is not about allowing gays to profess themselves homosexual and still be in the army, it relates to my article in our magazine because it is about gay rights and it proves that they will gain their fundamental rights over time no matter what. It may take some battles but the xenophobic freaks need to stop their oppression. Republicans, right winged Christians, homophobes.... your time is done. Keep in touch for more articles.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
>It may take some battles but the xenophobic freaks need to stop their oppression. Republicans, right winged Christians, homophobes
ReplyDeletebiased much? you should consider listening to the arch bishop of new mexico some time: no matter how hard this article made you rage, (and im guessing pretty hard based on all the butthurt coming from you) having a republican catholic explain it to you will make you rage twenty times harder.
I have to agree with you and the article, we are the same people and people are determined to get what they want, whatever that might be, including marriage.
ReplyDeleteThis kind of stuff makes me so angry. Why are some people so stupid? I hope humankind can change their ways and stop being so ignorant.
ReplyDelete-Marshmallow
I agree and i think this is a good article
ReplyDelete-Catch-
This sounds like an argumentative person I know... :) Cool, I'm glad you're so passionate about this issue! Keep your opinion strong. I'm looking forward to your article!
ReplyDelete-The Black Widow